Canadian Veterans Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

SNC-Lavalin Scandal

+82
Firestrike
Jumper
Ironman
Proctor
Jackson
Kizzer
Marshall
Saulman
Lonestar
Zoneforce
Diesel
Xrayxservice
Cooper
Stayner
JAFO
Caliber
Slider
Wolverine
Jeremiah
Leopard
Viper
Magnum
bosn181
Looper
Cypher
Charlie
Spectrum
Tazzer
Sandman
Zodiac
Enforcer
Armoured
Navigator
Vexmax
Starman
Ranger
Powergunner
Maxstar
Stealth
RunningLight
Glideon
Rekert
Riverway
Delta
Masefield
Colter
Falcon
Garrison
OutlawSoldier
Cool~Way
Forcell
Trooper
Lionfield
Seawolf
Rifleman
vet1
Silveray
Matrix
Dalton
Terrarium
Gridlock
Thunder
Scorpion
kodiak
Zapper
Ringo
Phrampton
Stanleyz
Rockarm
Mojave
Victor
Lucifer
Replica
Edgefore
Hammercore
RevForce
Warrior
Dragonforce
Alpha
Vizzer
SniperGod
Oliver
86 posters

Page 13 of 45 Previous  1 ... 8 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 29 ... 45  Next

Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Warrior Sun 24 Feb 2019, 7:16 pm

Unpacking the politics of the SNC-Lavalin affair

Global News
Published on Feb 24, 2019



Warrior
Warrior
Benefits Coordinator

Posts : 191
Join date : 2018-04-16

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by RunningLight Mon 25 Feb 2019, 8:43 am

Something Strange is Happening

Pierre Poilievre
Published on Feb 24, 2019






RunningLight
RunningLight
Benefits Coordinator

Posts : 289
Join date : 2017-10-12

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Stealth Mon 25 Feb 2019, 4:51 pm

Trudeau says Wilson-Raybould can discuss 'relevant matters' during testimony


Published Monday, February 25, 2019

OTTAWA – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has announced that Jody Wilson-Raybould will be able to "address relevant matters" when she appears before the House Justice Committee as part of its study into the SNC-Lavalin affair.

"Later today the government will confirm that the member from Vancouver-Granville will be able to address relevant matters at the committee while ensuring that the two active court cases are not jeopardized," Trudeau said during question period.

"We obviously take very seriously the right of everyone to share their perspectives in various ways," Trudeau told reporters on his way to the Commons.

The prime minister has faced calls to waive solicitor-client privilege in the matter to allow Wilson-Raybould to speak publicly about allegations of political pressure being placed on her by members of the PMO in regards to an ongoing criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.

This comes as Wilson-Raybould is expected to appear before the committee this week. While it was thought that she might testify on Tuesday, CTV News has been told that she is not scheduled to appear then.

Citing unnamed sources, The Globe and Mail reported on Feb. 7 that Trudeau’s office pressed Wilson-Raybould to drop a criminal prosecution against SNC-Lavalin when she was attorney general. It was alleged that the PMO wanted Wilson-Raybould to instruct federal prosecutors to change course and pursue a remediation agreement rather than criminal prosecution in the corruption and fraud case against the Quebec engineering and construction giant. CTV News has not independently verified the story.

When she was attorney general, Wilson-Raybould had the ability to direct federal prosecutors to take a different route with the charges against SNC-Lavalin but she did not, despite several meetings and conversations on the matter before and after federal prosecutors decided to carry on with the criminal case in the fall.

In January, Wilson-Raybould was shuffled into the veterans affairs portfolio, and was replaced as attorney general and justice minister by David Lametti, a Quebec MP. Wilson-Raybould accepted her new position, but then resigned from cabinet days after the Globe story broke. So far, she's maintained solicitor-client privilege as the reason she’s yet to speak out publicly about the allegations, though she’s signaled a desire to “speak my truth,” and reportedly told cabinet members when she met with them last week at her request, that the pressure was improper.

The House Justice Committee that has been looking into the affair has so far heard from Lametti, his deputy minister, and top bureaucrat Michael Wernick, who gave blunt and detailed testimony.

Wernick disputed the allegations reported in the Globe and sought to reframe them, saying that while it's likely Wilson-Raybould could have felt pressured, it’s a question of whether that constitutes as "inappropriate pressure," or pressure that comes with being part of the inner circle that makes key decisions with national implications. In his view, the pressure was "lawful and appropriate."

The committee study continues Monday afternoon with testimony from academics who will chime in on the underlying legal aspects at the heart of the affair. These include the legal provision known as remediation or deferred prosecution agreements, which were tucked into a recent omnibus bill following heavy SNC-Lavalin lobbying, the Shawcross doctrine—which has to do with the independence of the attorney general in making decisions—and the discussions between the AG and government colleagues on SNC-Lavalin.

Two previous opposition attempts to have senior PMO staff testify at the committee have been unsuccessful, as was a motion to compel Trudeau to waive solicitor-client privilege and have a public inquiry launched.

Opposition motion calls for PM to talk

Meanwhile in the House, the Conservatives have focused in on Trudeau in and are forcing the Commons to spend the day debating their motion to have him testify at the justice committee.

"Quite simply what we’ve seen unfold over the last two weeks is a textbook case of government corruption with those at the very top of the prime minister's office implicated in what could very well be the obstruction of justice," Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer told reporters on Monday.

The motion specifically invokes some of Trudeau’s own remarks on the case of alleged PMO political interference. The full text reads: "That, given the Prime Minister's comments of Wednesday, February 20, 2019, that the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights is the appropriate place for Canadians to get answers on the SNC-Lavalin affair, and given his alleged direct involvement in a sustained effort to influence SNC-Lavalin's criminal prosecution, the House order the Prime Minister to appear, testify and answer questions at the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, under oath, for a televised two-hour meeting, before Friday, March 15, 2019."

Scheer said that should the House order Trudeau to appear, he would have to testify at the committee.

In presenting his motion in the Commons, Scheer implored Liberal MPs to vote in favour of it.

"I invite all members of the Liberal Party to do the right thing. We know that you're under tremendous pressure from political operatives within your own party who are trying to protect themselves," Scheer said. "You have an opportunity and a responsibility to do the right thing, to stand up for the independent system of justice to prove that no one in Canada gets a special deal just because they're rich and powerful. There's one set of rules for every Canadian. You have the opportunity to do that today and I invite you to do the right thing."

Responding to Scheer's remarks, Liberal MP and parliamentary secretary for justice Arif Virani cited the ongoing study, in which members have said there is still a possibility for new witnesses to come forward. "Why the distrust in allowing the committee to simply continue to do its work?" he asked.

Liberal MP and parliamentary secretary to the government House leader, Kevin Lamoureux, joined the debate by invoking former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper, saying that for years the party has had "one focus, one agenda item and that is to personally attack members of this government and to take what I believe a course that is not in the best interest of Canadians."

Scheer said Wernick's testimony laid out the extent of unsolicited and co-ordinated efforts to have Wilson-Raybould change her mind.

In his response to Scheer's opening remarks in the Commons, Virani quoted a part of Wernick’s testimony that supported the government's position that Trudeau was consistent in telling Wilson-Raybould that offering a remediation agreement to SNC-Lavalin was her decision alone.

"The prime minster said at every occasion, verbally and in writing, she was the decider, so she was not giving legal advice to the prime minister. She was the decider, the full and final decider," Wernick said at committee last week.

The motion is scheduled to be put to a vote at 6:30 p.m. Monday.

NDP MP Tracey Ramsey used her time in the debate to bring up the perceived "racist and sexist undertones" of the ongoing affair, citing the personal attacks against the woman who was Canada’s first Indigenous justice minister and attorney general by unnamed Liberal sources in the days after the SNC-Lavalin controversy began unfolding. Trudeau has since apologized for not being quicker to condemn those comments.

To date, the government maintains that nothing improper occurred, though Trudeau's principal secretary resigned over the matter on Feb. 18, denying any wrongdoing.

Since the scandal hit Parliament Hill, federal ethics commissioner Mario Dion has launched an investigation, which Liberals continue to point to as the best avenue for examining the case, though such probes can often take months to complete.

"We continue to welcome the studies by the committee and by the ethics commissioner," Trudeau said Monday.




Stealth
Stealth
Registered User

Posts : 341
Join date : 2018-11-30

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Stealth Mon 25 Feb 2019, 5:27 pm

JWR Requests 30 Min of Time Before Testimony At Justice Committee in Letter to Chair

CanadaPoli
Published on Feb 25, 2019






Stealth
Stealth
Registered User

Posts : 341
Join date : 2018-11-30

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Stealth Mon 25 Feb 2019, 5:31 pm

Question Period: SNC-Lavalin affair — February 25, 2019



Stealth
Stealth
Registered User

Posts : 341
Join date : 2018-11-30

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Gridlock Mon 25 Feb 2019, 9:21 pm

PM waives attorney-client privilege in SNC-Lavalin affair Feb 25, 2019





Gridlock
Gridlock
Registered User

Posts : 243
Join date : 2018-12-30

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Gridlock Mon 25 Feb 2019, 9:25 pm

Power Play: Prosecuting corporations

Lawyer Timothy Cullen breaks down the new proposed policy changes for convicted corporations seeking federal contracts.

Feb 25, 2019



Gridlock
Gridlock
Registered User

Posts : 243
Join date : 2018-12-30

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Gridlock Mon 25 Feb 2019, 9:28 pm

Power Play: Strategy Session

A panel of strategists weighs in on the length of time Wilson-Raybould is requesting for her opening statement when she testifies.

Feb 25, 2019



Gridlock
Gridlock
Registered User

Posts : 243
Join date : 2018-12-30

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Terrarium Tue 26 Feb 2019, 8:11 am

Trudeau clears way for Wilson-Raybould to speak publicly on SNC-Lavalin affair

CBC News: The National
Published on Feb 25, 2019





Terrarium
Terrarium
Registered User

Posts : 274
Join date : 2019-01-15

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Terrarium Tue 26 Feb 2019, 8:13 am

Wilson-Raybould pens letter to Justice Committee

CityNews Toronto
Published on Feb 25, 2019





Terrarium
Terrarium
Registered User

Posts : 274
Join date : 2019-01-15

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Terrarium Tue 26 Feb 2019, 8:19 am

CTV National News: Wilson-Raybould to testify Feb 25, 2019

Joyce Napier has the latest on the SNC-Lavalin affair as the government waives attorney-client privilege.



Terrarium
Terrarium
Registered User

Posts : 274
Join date : 2019-01-15

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Maxstar Tue 26 Feb 2019, 11:09 am

Trudeau waives almost all confidentiality restrictions on Wilson Raybould

Wilson-Raybould cannot speak publicly about communications she had with director of public prosecutions Kathleen Roussel

February 26, 2019
by Mia Rabson and Teresa Wright

OTTAWA – Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is waiving both solicitor-client privilege and cabinet confidentiality for his former attorney general, paving the way for Jody Wilson-Raybould to finally tell her side of the SNC-Lavalin saga to the House of Commons justice committee and the ethics commissioner.

An order-in-council published Monday evening lifts both confidentiality restrictions on Wilson-Raybould and anyone she talked to about her role in deciding whether or not to prosecute SNC-Lavalin for bribery and fraud to cooperate with ongoing investigations by both the committee and the ethics commissioner.

That could include conversations she is known to have had with Trudeau himself, his former principal secretary Gerald Butts, chief of staff Katie Telford and Privy Council clerk Michael Wernick.


The order specifically notes, however, that Wilson-Raybould cannot speak publicly about any information or communications she had with director of public prosecutions Kathleen Roussel about the case.

Trudeau hinted at the order to come during question period Monday.

“I am pleased also to confirm that later today the government will confirm that the member for Vancouver-Granville will be able to address relevant matters at the committee, while ensuring that the two active court cases are not jeopardized,” he said.

Wilson-Raybould may appear at the House of Commons justice committee as early as Wednesday to explain what type of pressure she felt she was under not to pursue a criminal prosecution of the Quebec engineering giant, and allow the firm to negotiate a remediation agreement instead.

The two cases Trudeau referenced are the ongoing criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin for allegedly bribing Libyan officials to secure contracts there, and a request by SNC-Lavalin executives that a judge overturn the decision by the director of public prosecutions not to enter into a remediation agreement.

Earlier this month anonymous sources told the Globe and Mail newspaper that Wilson-Raybould had been pressured by Trudeau and his aides to overturn the public prosecutor and proceed to a remediation agreement. Trudeau has said he was always clear that the final decision rested with her, though he acknowledges both he and his aides had several conversations with her throughout the fall to provide her with information to help her make the decision.

Trudeau and Wilson-Raybould have both been awaiting legal advice on the extent of solicitor-client privilege protecting their conversations. She has said more than once that the decision to waive that privilege is not hers to make.

In a letter to the Commons justice committee Monday she said she was “anxious” to appear but wasn’t going to confirm her attendance until she had “clarity” about what she can say.

The committee offered her times on both Tuesday and Wednesday this week, but as of Monday evening, there was no formal notice of her appearance.

She has asked to deliver a 30-minute opening statement before she takes questions from committee members, which is about three times the length most witnesses are granted.

The chances Trudeau gets asked to testify at the committee himself fell from slim to almost none Monday after the Liberals defeated a Tory motion asking the House of Commons to order the prime minister to appear.

Arif Virani, the parliamentary secretary to the minister of justice, said the committee can decide for itself what witnesses to call. Liberal MP Marc Miller noted that over the course of the last week, Trudeau had answered at least 40 questions on the matter in the House of Commons.

Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said Canadians should be “outraged” that Liberal politicians made any attempt to influence the outcome of a criminal case and the prime minister needs to explain himself.

“Quite simply what we’ve seen unfold over the last two weeks is a textbook case of government corruption with those at the very top of the Prime Minister’s Office implicated in what could very well be the obstruction of justice,” Scheer said in a news conference.

Scheer said the known facts include that SNC-Lavalin successfully lobbied the government for the Criminal Code to be changed to allow for remediation agreements. Then, when the public prosecutor decided the company wasn’t going to be eligible for one, the Liberals launched “an unsolicited, co-ordinated and sustained effort by the PM himself to get Wilson-Raybould” to override that decision.

Wilson-Raybould was shuffled out of justice into veterans affairs in mid-January, and the Conservatives allege she was moved because she didn’t do what the Prime Minister’s Office wanted on SNC-Lavalin.

A spokeswoman for the PMO said Monday the government does not comment about human resource decisions.

Wilson-Raybould resigned from cabinet altogether a few days after the allegations first surfaced but remains a Liberal MP and says she intends to run again as a Liberal in the next election.

The justice committee heard from a number of legal experts Monday who offered their opinions on the Shawcross doctrine, which says an attorney general can consult with officials on decisions about whether to move forward with a criminal prosecution, but that those consultations cannot veer into pressure.

Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, a former Saskatchewan judge who is currently senior associate counsel for Woodward and Co. LLP, said she believes anyone who approached Wilson-Raybould to discuss the SNC-Lavalin case after the decision had been made to prosecute should only have only done so under a specific legal authority – and added her belief the Shawcross doctrine offers only a “flimsy foundation” for such meetings.

“It is not inappropriate for a public official for to engage with prosecutors and say, ‘Should you require additional information, I am standing ready to provide it to you’,” Turpel-Lafond told the committee.

“If the purpose was to persuade the attorney general as chief prosecutor to take a different position on a prosecution, it triggers a serious rule-of-law concern.”

She added that she felt it was important to hear from all parties involved to determine the scope of those discussions in the SNC-Lavalin case.

The committee also heard from two lawyers who spoke in favour of remediation agreements with corporations that face charges such as bribery and fraud.

Kenneth Jull of Gardiner Roberts LLP said these agreements offer an incentive for companies to self-report issues of malfeasance, giving them options to fix problems while not penalizing employees, pensioners and customers who would suffer if the business goes under as a result of prosecution.






Maxstar
Maxstar
Registered User

Posts : 345
Join date : 2017-11-17

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Oliver Tue 26 Feb 2019, 1:13 pm

Committee wants Wilson-Raybould to testify tomorrow


Published Tuesday, February 26, 2019 11:02AM EST
Last Updated Tuesday, February 26, 2019 12:04PM EST

OTTAWA – Now that the government has waived Jody Wilson-Raybould's solicitor-client privilege and cabinet confidence, the House Justice Committee wants to hear from the former cabinet minister at the centre of the ongoing SNC-Lavalin affair within the next 24 hours.

Tuesday morning the committee sent Wilson-Raybould a letter requesting her presence at 3:15 on Wednesday afternoon. Wilson-Raybould has yet to confirm that she'll appear at this time.

Citing the Order in Council Prime Minister Justin Trudeau issued Monday evening, the committee says they now have the clarity on confidence, privilege, and a parliamentary convention known as "sub judice" which deals with speaking about cases currently before the courts. These were issues that both Wilson-Raybould and the MPs who are conducting the probe were looking for more legal assurances on before having her appear.

As well, the committee has agreed to a request Wilson-Raybould made in writing to the committee on Monday: that she be granted an "extended opening statement" lasting 30 minutes during which she would be able to go through everything she recalls about communications she was involved in regarding SNC-Lavalin. Most opening statements at committees are limited to 10 minutes.

"Given the foregoing we would like to schedule your testimony… and would appreciate a swift response" the letter from committee chair Anthony Housefather reads.

In her Monday letter Wilson-Raybould said that she is "anxious" to appear and wrote that she'd be happy to stay for as long as the committee wishes to answer questions. Last week in the House of Commons she rose to say that she hopes she would be granted the ability to “speak my truth.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told reporters on his way to Tuesday morning's cabinet meeting that he is "pleased" that Wilson-Raybould will be able to "share her perspective."

"It's important that people get an opportunity to testify or share their point of view at committee. As we said, waving the privilege, waiving cabinet confidentiality is something that we had to take very seriously,” Trudeau said.

'There were contacts between lawyers'

On his way into cabinet Tuesday morning, Justice Minister and Attorney General David Lametti said that, before waiving attorney-client privilege and cabinet confidence, federal lawyers were in touch with Wilson-Raybould's counsel.

"It is fair to say that there were contacts between lawyers but I won't go any further than that," Lametti told reporters Tuesday morning.

In her letter of resignation as Veterans Affairs Minister Wilson-Raybould said she retained former Supreme Court judge Thomas Cromwell to provide advice on speaking publicly about the scandal. Up until now she has maintained solicitor-client privilege as the reason she’s been unable to speak to allegations of political pressure being placed on her by members of the PMO in regards to an ongoing criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.

This specific waiver only permits Wilson-Raybould to speak about the matter to the House Justice Committee, however, as part of its study into the SNC-Lavalin affair, and to the federal ethics commissioner who has also launched an investigation.

"We have, I believe as a government, worked to demonstrate transparency as well as balancing the fact that there is ongoing litigation we do not want to compromise, so we feel we’ve done that with this agreement," Lametti said.

The government made the directive in an Order in Council posted Monday evening. The order authorizes her, as well as "any person who directly participated in discussions with her," to speak to the committee and ethics commissioner, about the criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.

The order relates to any information or communications that have to do with Wilson-Raybould's time as the attorney general and exercising her authority under the Director of Public Prosecutions Act, and only in regards to the two ongoing probes of the matter, and not a blanket permission for Wilson-Raybould to speak.

As well, the order states that Director of Public Prosecutions Kathleen Roussel is exempted from this waiving of privilege and any information or conversations between Wilson-Raybould and Roussel cannot be disclosed, "in order to uphold the integrity of any criminal or civil proceedings," the prime minister's office states in the Order in Council.






Oliver
Oliver
Benefits Coordinator

Posts : 226
Join date : 2018-02-28

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Powergunner Tue 26 Feb 2019, 4:56 pm

Wilson-Raybould to testify on SNC-Lavalin affair on Wednesday


Published Tuesday, February 26, 2019 11:02AM EST
Last Updated Tuesday, February 26, 2019 2:53PM EST

OTTAWA – Jody Wilson-Raybould has accepted the House Justice Committee's invitation to testify on the ongoing SNC-Lavalin affair on Wednesday, now that the government has waived solicitor-client privilege and cabinet confidence.

Tuesday morning the committee sent Wilson-Raybould a letter requesting her presence at 3:15 on Wednesday afternoon. CTV News asked Wilson-Raybould whether or not she will appear tomorrow, after coming out of a meeting with her lawyer in downtown Ottawa and she would not comment, saying she has sent a letter to the committee this afternoon. CTV News has since confirmed that in that letter, Wilson-Raybould accepted the committee’s invitation and will speak.

Citing the Order in Council Prime Minister Justin Trudeau issued Monday evening, the committee says they now have the clarity on confidence, privilege, and a parliamentary convention known as "sub judice" which deals with speaking about cases currently before the courts. These were issues that both Wilson-Raybould and the MPs who are conducting the probe were looking for more legal assurances on before having her appear.


As well, the committee has agreed to a request Wilson-Raybould made in writing to the committee on Monday: that she be granted an "extended opening statement" lasting 30 minutes during which she would be able to go through everything she recalls about communications she was involved in regarding SNC-Lavalin. Most opening statements at committees are limited to 10 minutes.

"Given the foregoing we would like to schedule your testimony… and would appreciate a swift response" the letter from committee chair Anthony Housefather reads.

In her Monday letter Wilson-Raybould said that she is "anxious" to appear and wrote that she'd be happy to stay for as long as the committee wishes to answer questions. Last week in the House of Commons she rose to say that she hopes she would be granted the ability to “speak my truth,” in relation to the allegations of political pressure being placed on her by members of the PMO in regards to an ongoing criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin, as reported by The Globe and Mail.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told reporters on his way to Tuesday morning's cabinet meeting that he is "pleased" that Wilson-Raybould will be able to "share her perspective."

"It's important that people get an opportunity to testify or share their point of view at committee. As we said, waving the privilege, waiving cabinet confidentiality is something that we had to take very seriously,” Trudeau said.

"It's just important that she speak and that all of the mystery goes. This is important for all of us to get on with our work," said Crown Indigenous Relations Minister Carolyn Bennett on her way out of cabinet on Tuesday. "There is a view that in terms of the story, we need to hear her side of it," she said.

Over the last few weeks the opposition parties have focused in on this scandal, with Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer calling it a "textbook case of government corruption with those at the very top of the prime minister's office implicated in what could very well be the obstruction of justice." The opposition Conservatives and New Democrats have sought to have Trudeau and several senior PMO staff believed to be central to the story testify, and a public inquiry called, with no success.

Tuesday, Government House Leader Bardish Chagger criticized the opposition and its messaging throughout this ongoing controversy.

"Once upon a time it was a message that 'oh the committee will never meet on this issue.' They're meeting on this issue. Then we started talking about 'oh, witnesses will never be allowed to appear.' Witnesses are appearing. They’re being asked tough questions. 'Oh, the former Attorney General will not be allowed to appear.' Guess what? She is appearing. 'Oh the Prime Minister is not going to let her speak.' The Prime Minister has done whatever he can to work with the current Attorney General to ensure that the opportunity is there," Chagger said.

'There were contacts between lawyers'

On his way into cabinet Tuesday morning, Justice Minister and Attorney General David Lametti said that, before waiving attorney-client privilege and cabinet confidence, federal lawyers were in touch with Wilson-Raybould's counsel.

"It is fair to say that there were contacts between lawyers but I won't go any further than that," Lametti told reporters Tuesday morning.

In her letter of resignation as Veterans Affairs Minister Wilson-Raybould said she retained former Supreme Court judge Thomas Cromwell to provide advice on speaking publicly about the scandal. Up until now she has maintained solicitor-client privilege as the reason she’s been unable to speak to the allegations.

This specific waiver only permits Wilson-Raybould to speak about the matter to the House Justice Committee, however, as part of its study into the SNC-Lavalin affair, and to the federal ethics commissioner who has also launched an investigation.

"We have, I believe as a government, worked to demonstrate transparency as well as balancing the fact that there is ongoing litigation we do not want to compromise, so we feel we’ve done that with this agreement," Lametti said.

The government made the directive in an Order in Council posted Monday evening. The order authorizes her, as well as "any person who directly participated in discussions with her," to speak to the committee and ethics commissioner, about the criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin.

The order relates to any information or communications that have to do with Wilson-Raybould's time as the attorney general and exercising her authority under the Director of Public Prosecutions Act, and only in regards to the two ongoing probes of the matter, and not a blanket permission for Wilson-Raybould to speak.

As well, the order states that Director of Public Prosecutions Kathleen Roussel is exempted from this waiving of privilege and any information or conversations between Wilson-Raybould and Roussel cannot be disclosed, "in order to uphold the integrity of any criminal or civil proceedings," the prime minister's office states in the Order in Council.

Recap on the story so far

On Feb. 7, citing unnamed sources, The Globe and Mail reported that Trudeau's office pressed Wilson-Raybould to drop a criminal prosecution against SNC-Lavalin when she was attorney general. It was alleged that the PMO wanted Wilson-Raybould to instruct federal prosecutors to change course and pursue a remediation agreement rather than criminal prosecution in the corruption and fraud case against the Quebec engineering and construction giant. CTV News has not independently verified the story.

Remediation agreements — or Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPAs) — can include having the company accept responsibility, denounce the wrongdoing, vow to implement corrective measures, and pay financial penalties.

In contrast, if the company was criminally convicted it would be banned from securing Canadian government contracts for a decade, potentially putting jobs on the line.

When she was attorney general, Wilson-Raybould had the ability to direct the Director of Public Prosecutions to take a different route with the charges against SNC-Lavalin but she did not, despite several meetings and conversations before and after federal prosecutors decided to carry on with the criminal case in the fall.

In January, Wilson-Raybould was shuffled into the veterans affairs portfolio, and was replaced as attorney general and justice minister by David Lametti, a Quebec MP. Wilson-Raybould accepted her new position, but then resigned from cabinet days after the Globe story broke amid the opposition framing this as her being demoted for not changing her position on a deferred prosecution.

The House Justice Committee began probing the matter last week. As part of the study the committee has already heard from Lametti, his deputy minister, and top bureaucrat Michael Wernick, who gave blunt and detailed testimony in which he sought to reframe the Globe report, saying that while it's likely Wilson-Raybould could have felt pressured, it's a question of whether that constitutes as "inappropriate pressure," or pressure that comes with being part of the inner circle that makes key decisions with national implications.

Then on Monday the committee heard from a slate of academic witnesses on the underlying legal aspects at the heart of the affair. These include the legal provision known as remediation or deferred prosecution agreements, which were tucked into a recent omnibus bill following heavy SNC-Lavalin lobbying, and the Shawcross doctrine; which has to do with the independence of the attorney general in making decisions.

These witnesses offered their hypothetical perspectives about the propriety of attorney generals making prosecutorial decisions, when the various principles are activated, and the balance of seeking advice from cabinet colleagues without succumbing to or factoring in politics.

Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, a legal counsel with Woodward and Company LLP, and law professor at the University of British Columbia, told the committee that what needs to be understood is how the situation unfolded.

"If the purpose was to persuade the attorney general as chief prosecutor to take a different position on a prosecution, it triggers a serious rule-of-law concern, and how will we know whether that’s serious or not? Well, obviously you need to hear from those who may have been involved," Turpel-Lafond told the committee on Monday.

To date, the government maintains that nothing improper occurred, though Trudeau's principal secretary resigned over the matter on Feb. 18, denying any wrongdoing.

Since the scandal hit Parliament Hill, federal ethics commissioner Mario Dion has launched an investigation, which Liberals continue to point to as the best avenue for examining the case, though such probes can often take months to complete.





Powergunner
Powergunner
CF Coordinator

Posts : 417
Join date : 2018-06-05

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Ranger Tue 26 Feb 2019, 9:10 pm

'Power Play: View from the Hill'

Jody Wilson-Raybould is set to testify before the House Justice Committee. MPs share what question they would ask the former minister.

Feb 26, 2019



Ranger
Ranger
Registered User

Posts : 330
Join date : 2018-01-25

Back to top Go down

SNC-Lavalin Scandal - Page 13 Empty Re: SNC-Lavalin Scandal

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 13 of 45 Previous  1 ... 8 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 29 ... 45  Next

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum